Media Optimization And Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Waste By Cellulolytic Bacteria Isolated From Gut of A Termite
Citation
MLA Style:Yash Varma, Sandeep Chovatiya, Dipika Patel, Snehal Ingle, Nisha Daxini, Sanjay Lal "Media Optimization And Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Waste By Cellulolytic Bacteria Isolated From Gut of A Termite" International Journal of Biotech Trends and Technology 11.2 (2021): 8-14.
APA Style:Yash Varma, Sandeep Chovatiya, Dipika Patel, Snehal Ingle, Nisha Daxini, Sanjay Lal 2021). Media Optimization And Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Waste By Cellulolytic Bacteria Isolated From Gut of A Termite. International Journal of Biotech Trends and Technology, 11(2), 8-14.
Abstract
Cellulase creation from bacteria can be a favourable position as the enzyme generation rate is typically higher because of the higher bacterial development rate when contrasted with fungi. Screening of bacteria, advancement of fermentation conditions and choice of substrates are imperative for the fruitful creation of cellulase. This study was conducted from isolation of cellulolytic bacteria from Damp wood termite. They were similar like Citrobacter, Enterobacter and Cellulomonas and using media optimization method for highest production of cellulase and using this cellulase for saccharification of lignocellulosic waste. The highest cellulase producing ability of isolate from this study was found to be 51.9 IU/ml with 48 hours of incubation and as carboxymethyl cellulose as substrate. Treated and untreated corncob was subjected to saccharification. Highest saccharification was observed with 15gm of substrate treated with 3% NaOH at 50ºC for 30min.
References
[1] M. Ohkuma, S. Noda, and T. Kudo., Phylogenetic Diversity of Nitrogen Fixation Genes in the Symbiotic Microbial Community in the Gut of Diverse Termites, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65(11) (1999) 4926–4934.
[2] Peristiwati, Y. S. Natamihardja, and H. Herlini., Isolation and identification of cellulolytic bacteria from termites gut ( Cryptotermes sp .), J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1013 (2018) 012173.
[3] S. Moriya, K. Tanaka, M. Ohkuma, S. Sugano, and T. Kudo., Diversification of the Microtubule System in the Early Stage of Eukaryote Evolution: Elongation Factor 1? and ?-Tubulin Protein Phylogeny of Termite Symbiotic Oxymonad and Hypermastigote Protists,” J. Mol. Evol., 52(1) (2001) 6–16.
[4] G. Tokuda and H. Watanabe., Hidden cellulases in termites: revision of an old hypothesis, Biol. Lett., 3(3) (2007) 336–339.
[5] A. Ferbiyanto, I. Rusmana, and R. Raffiudin., Characterization and Identification of Cellulolytic Bacteria from gut of Worker Macrotermes gilvus, HAYATI J. Biosci., 22(4) (2015) 197–200.
[6] Z. Barta, K. Kovacs, K. Reczey, and G. Zacchi., Process Design and Economics of On-Site Cellulase Production on Various Carbon Sources in a Softwood-Based Ethanol Plant, Enzyme Res., 2010 (2010) 1–8.
[7] C.-M. Wang, C.-L. Shyu, S.-P. Ho, and S. Chiou., Characterization of a novel thermophilic, cellulose-degrading bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain B39, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 47(1) (2008) 46–53.
[8] S. Chovatiya, S. Ingle, D. Patel, and B. Thakkar., Isolation of Bacteria Producing Cellulase from Tilapia Fish Gut and Media Optimization for Celluase Production using Plackett Burman Design, Int. J. Biotech Trends Technol. ( IJBTT ), 7(2) (2017)13–19.
[9] T. K. Ghose., Measurement of Cellulase Activities, Pure Appl. Chem., 59(2) (1987) 257–268.
[10] S. Sharma et al., Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria of Termite Gut from North Eastern Region of India Special Issue on : Recent Advances in Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria of Termite Gut from North Eastern Region, South Asian J. Exp. Biol., 5(6) (2015) 283–290.
[11] M. Wenzel, M. Berchtold, P. Kampfer, and H. Konig., Aerobic and facultatively anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis, J. Appl. Microbiol., 92 (2002) 32–40.
[12] M. Maki, K. T. Leung, and W. Qin., The prospects of cellulase-producing bacteria for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass, Int. J. Biol. Sci., 5(5) (2009) 500–516.
[13] G. M. Bohlmann., Process economic considerations for production of ethanol from biomass feedstocks, Ind. Biotechnol., 2(1) (2006) 14–20.
[14] A. Kazemi, S. Rasoul-Amini, M. Shahbazi, A. Safari, and Y. Ghasemi*, Isolation, Identification, And Media Optimization Of High-Level Cellulase Production By Bacillus Sp. Bccs A3, In A Fermentation System Using Response Surface Methodology, Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol., 44(2) (2014) 107–118.
[15] T. Sartori, H. Tibolla, E. Prigol, L. M. Colla, J. A. V. Costa, and T. E. Bertolin., Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Residues by Cellulases Obtained from Solid State Fermentation Using Trichoderma viride, Biomed Res. Int., (2015) 1–9.
[16] N. Annamalai, M. V. Rajeswari, and T. Balasubramanian., Enzymatic saccharification of pretreated rice straw by cellulase produced from Bacillus carboniphilus CAS 3 utilizing lignocellulosic wastes through statistical optimization, Biomass and Bioenergy, 68 (2014) 151–160.
[17] A. G. Marangoni., Enzyme Kinetics: A Modern Approach. , John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA., (2003).
[18] D. Schell., A bioethanol process development unit: initial operating experiences and results with a corn fiber feedstock, Bioresour. Technol., 91(2) (2004) 179–188.
[19] M. Camassola and A. J.P. Dillon., Cellulase Determination: Modifications to Make the Filter Paper Assay Easy, Fast, Practical and Efficient, J. Anal. Bioanal. Tech., 1(S1) (2012) 1–5.
Keywords
Termites, Cellulolytic Bacteria, Gram Staining, Media Optimization, Placket – Burman Method, Saccharification, Corn cob