Effect of Adhesive Obturation and Post Obturation Monoblock Systems on Reinforcement of Peri-Cervical Dentin (PCD)

 
 
International Journal of Biotech Trends and Technology (IJBTT)
 
© 2015 by IJBTT Journal
Volume - 5 Issue - 1                          
Year of Publication : 2015
Authors : Vipin Arora , M P Yadav , S P Singh , Pooja Arora , Preeti Choudhary

Vipin Arora , M P Yadav , S P Singh , Pooja Arora , Preeti Choudhary. "Effect of Adhesive Obturation and Post Obturation Monoblock Systems on Reinforcement of Peri-Cervical Dentin (PCD)", International Journal of Biotech Trends and Technology (IJBTT), V5(1):1-6 Jan - Mar 2015. Published by Seventh Sense Research Group.

Abstract

A total of forty five extracted, intact maxillary premolar teeth were selected.After preparation of standaridized access, Crowns were resected so that a final dimension of 4 mm from one mm below highest point of proximal cervical line was achieved. Then, the enamel was carefully removed with a diamond abrasive point from all the surfaces.Following obturation, obturation material was removed till a depth of 5 mm from cervical line followed by post endodontic restoration till that depth Group 1:Activ GP + nRMGIC, Group 2:Real seal + silorane composite and Group 3:No obturation + temporary cement.The specimens were embedded and tested for fracture resistace in universal testing machine.Data was analysed with student t test and one way ANOVA.

References

[1] Bender IB, Freeland JB. Adult root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 107:413–9.
[2] Fuss Z, Lustig J, Tamse A. Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 1999; 32:283–6.
[3] Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17:338–42.
[4] Caplan DJ, Weintraub JA. Factors related to loss of root canal filled teeth. J Public Health Dent 1997; 57:31–9.
[5] Helfer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H. Determination of moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34: 661-70.
[6] John Q. Holcomb, David L Pitts, Jack I. Nicholls. Further investigation of spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod 1987;13: 277-84.
[7] Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992;18: 440-3.
[8] Trabert K,Caputo A, Abou-Rass M. Tooth Fracture – comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments.J Endod 1978;4:341-5.
[9] B. D. Rundquist, A. Versluis. How does canal taper affect root stresses? Int Endod J. 2006;39 (3): 226–237.
[10] Zandbiglari T, Davids H, Schäfer E. Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Jan; 101(1):126-31.
[11] Chankhrit Sathorn, Joseph E.A., Palamara, Harold H. Messer. A comparison of the effects of two canal preparation techniques on root fracture susceptibility and fracture pattern. J Endod 2005; 34:283–287.
[12] Clark D, Khademi J.Modern endodontic access and dentin conservation, part 2. Dent Today. 2009; 28(11):86-90
[13] Clark D, Khademi J.Modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54(2):249-73.
[14] Clark D, Khademi JA.Case studies in modern molar endodontic access and directed dentin conservation. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54(2):275-89.
[15] Clark D, Khademi J.Modern endodontic access and dentin conservation, Part I. Dent Today. 2009;28(10):86-90.
[16] Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2006; 32:553–5.
[17] Marshall SJ, Balooch M, Breunig T, et al. Human dentin and the dentin-resin adhesive ınterface. Acta Mater 1998; 46:2529–39.
[18] Gesi A, Raffaelli O, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod 2005; 31:809–13.
[19] Ribeiro FC, Souza-Gabriel AE, Marchesan MA, Alfredo E, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility. J Dent 2008; 36:69–73.
[20] Johnson ME, Stewart GP, Nielsen CJ, Hatton JF. Evaluation of root reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90:360–4.
[21] Scha¨ fer E, Zandbiglari T, Scha¨ fer J. Influence of resin-based adhesive root canal fillings on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots: an in vitro preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 274–9.
[22] Chad Williams,Robert J. Loushine,R. Norman Weller,David H. Pashley ,Franklin R. Tay. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta percha. J Endod 2006; 32: 553-555.
[23] Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. J Endod 2007;33:856-8.
[24] Abdo SB, Eldarrat AH. Fracture resistance of overtly flaring root canals filled with resin based obturation material. Dent Res J 2013;10:59-64.
[25] Karapinar Kazandag M, Sunay H, Tanalp J, Bayirli G. Fracture resistance of roots using different canal filling systems. Int Endod J 2009;42:705-10
[26] Koch K, Brave D. A new endodontic obturation technique. Dent Today 2006;25:102,104-7.
[27] Monga P, Sharma V, Kumar S. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2009;12:154-9.
[28] Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:152-5.
[29] Upadhyay S, Rao A. Nanoionomer: evaluation of microleakage. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:20-4.
[30] Grande NM, Plotino G, Lavorgna L, Ioppolo P, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Influence of different root canal-filling materials on the mechanical properties of root canal dentin. J Endod 2007;33:859-63.
[31] Assif D, Nissan J, Gafni Y, Gordon M. Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:462-5.
[32] Bassir MM, Labibzadeh A, Mollaverdi F. The effect of amount of lost tooth structure and restorative technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:413-7.
[33] Ghoneim AG, Lutfy RA, Sabet NE, Fayyad DM. Resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Novel canal filling systems. J Endod 2011;37:1590-2.
[34] Abd El Halim S, Zaki D. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types. Oper Dent 2011;36:36-42.
[35] Gupta SK, Gupta J, Saraswathi V, Ballal V, Acharya SR. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class V cavities using various glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. J Interdiscip Dentistry 2012;2:164-9.
[36] Teixeria FB, Teixeria ECN, Thompson JY, Trope M. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:646-52.
[37] Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson J, Leinfelder KF, Trope M. Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:348-54.
[38] Baba SM, Grover S, Tyagi V. Fracture resistance of teeth obturated with Gutta percha and Resilon: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:61-4.
[39] Abdo S B, Eldarrat A H. Fracture resistance of overtly flaring root canals filled with resin based obturation material. Dent Res J 2013;10:59-64.
[40] Hamouda IM, Shehata SH. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with modern restorative materials. J Biomed Res. 2011;25:418-24.
[41] Mittal N, Sajjan GS. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars by various restorative materials- an invitro study. Ind J Dent Sci 2011;10:1-4.

Keywords
Activ GP, Fracture resistance, monoblock, Pericervical dentin,Realseal, nanoionomer,Silorane composite